Free market theory and corporate social responsibility

Needless to say, this does not mean that it is easy to judge how well he is performing his task. As a result, Whole Foods' high prices do not turn customers away from shopping.

They do not try to manipulate or falsely advertise to potential consumers. Companies that ethically market to consumers are placing a higher value on their customers and respecting them as people who are ends in themselves. Though philosophers have discussed abstract ethical dilemmas for most of recorded history, there appears to be no universal answer to resolve ethical problems.

Bimbothe largest bakery in Mexicois an excellent example of this theater. As for the impact on society, it depends. CSR initiates where legal obligation declines.

Through this experimental process, our scarce knowledge is put to its best uses and society benefits. What does sustainability mean within each of the three columns of the theory of the triple bottom line?

Most of the discussion of social responsibility is directed at corporations, so in what follows I shall mostly neglect the individual proprietors and speak of corporate Free market theory and corporate social responsibility.

This possibility leads immediately to the conclusion that concern for corporate sustainability in financial terms argues against the dumping. What if wind power is not technologically feasible, or what if consumers will be unsatisfied with their power if it is delivered by wind technology.

In essence, the introduction of the CD destroyed the album. Each of the three discussed theories—corporate social responsibility, the triple bottom line, stakeholder theory—can be fit into the movie A Civil Action.

GE should invest in wind power; Wal-Mart should pay its workers more.

Theories of CSR

In either case, the key point is that, in his capacity as a corporate executive, the manager is the agent of the individuals who own the corporation or establish the eleemosynary institution, and his primary responsibility is to them. At the same time, I can express admiration for those individual proprietors or owners of closely held corporations or stockholders of more broadly held corporations who disdain such tactics as approaching fraud.

The authors describe that the company hires women in villages and provides them with micro-finance loans to sell soaps, oils, detergents, and other products door-to-door.

The threat of governmental overthrow from below sounds remote—almost absurd—to Americans who are accustomed to a solid middle class and minimal resentment of the wealthy. Now there are large sets of issues that need to be confronted and managed outside of, and independent of the struggle for money.

If the enterprise produces chemicals for industrial use and is located in a small Massachusetts town, the stakeholders include: Consequently, the field of business ethics has mainly concerned conflicts and dilemmas erupting inside the company as people try to work together to win in the very competitive economic world.

Several executives suggest that employees are their most valuable asset and that the ability to retain them leads to organization success. If he is correct, the marketplace will reward GE. This is characterized as the "soul" of a company, expressing the social and environmental priorities of the founders.

Thus, the investment is warranted. It may indicate, however, that for a business to be stable over the long term, opportunities and subsequently wealth need to be spread out to cover as many people as possible.

The outer limits of stakeholding are blurry. As socially responsible activities, in the opinion of Friedman, reduce wealth, companies should not engage in any charitable activities.

As a consequence, the company wants to introduce a new model to collect and recycle old furniture. Reading the energy consumer tea leaves, Jeffrey Immelt may have realized that wind power is technologically feasible and that consumers will prefer wind power over other alternatives.

The wealth of the United States, Europe, Japan and much of East Asia stand as a testament to the universal power of economic freedom and capitalism to unleash the power of economic growth and lift hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.

Free Markets or

It also calls for investing in employee work conditions such as health care and education which may enhance productivity and retention. Meijer and Schuyt examined the role of Corporate Social Responsibility in purchasing behaviour and found that for Dutch consumers, corporate social performance serves more as a Hygiene Factor than as a Motivator.

Firstly, Friedman fails to acknowledge that acting ethically can be a valuable marketing proposition. In many cases transparency is an important value for those promoting stakeholder ethics.

Milton Friedman on Corporate Social Responsibility

Perform ongoing monitoring and quantitative measurement of changes in the Social License to Operate of the company Potential business benefits[ edit ] A large body of literature exhorts business to adopt non-financial measures of success e.

Recycling or cleaning up contamination that already exists is important here, as is limiting the pollution emitted from factories, cars, and consumer products in the first place.

The researchers assert that programs in this theater strive to deliver social or environmental benefits to support a company's operation across the value chain by improving efficiency. In fact, they are pleased buying organic products that come from sustainable practices.

Three Approaches to Corporate Responsibility According to the traditional view of the corporation, it exists primarily to make profits.

Corporate social responsibility

They are capable of being extremely farsighted and clearheaded in matters that are internal to their businesses. The company strives to meet social welfare needs.Corporate social responsibility as a specific theory affirms that corporations are entities with economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic obligations.

Corporations responsible for a triple bottom line seek sustainability in the economic, social, and environmental realms. Decades of debate on corporate social responsibility (CSR) have resulted in a substantial body of literature offering a number of philosophies that despite real and relevant differences among their theoretical assumptions express consensus about the fundamental idea that business corporations have an obligation to work for social betterment.

Corporate social responsibility

Free Markets or "Corporate Social Responsibility" Wayne Winegarden in a free market there are many other experiments with other technologies (some old, some new) occurring simultaneously. Business Ethics Assignment #7 Marco A. Garza Chapter 3: Corporate Social Responsibility 1.

Explain the connection between the economic model of corporate social responsibility and “free market” or “neoclassical” economic theory. The main relationship between the two is that the economic model of social responsibility has its roots in free market economic theory%(11).

Most of the discussion of social responsibility is directed at corporations, so in what follows I shall mostly neglect the individual proprietors and speak of corporate executives. In a free-enterprise, private-property sys­tem, a corporate executive is an employee of the owners of the business.

Corporate social responsibility (CSR, also called corporate sustainability, sustainable business, corporate conscience, corporate citizenship or responsible business) is a type of international private business self-regulation.

Free market theory and corporate social responsibility
Rated 5/5 based on 90 review