That's right, football and men's basketball players get paid; lacrosse, field hockey, softball, baseball, soccer players get nothing. Student-athletes are going to school to learn, and many are lucky enough to do so for reduced cost, given the often generous athletic scholarships.
Neither is the student-journalist who spends his nights writing freelance stories and picking up as much money along the way as he can. Coaches might have a big effect on a team, but it is up to the athletes to get it done. While the jersey the team sells does not have the player's name on the back of it, far more fans will buy Should college athletes get paid for jersey over a jersey with a random number on it.
Where would the money even come from? The best college athletes in the two revenue-producing sports have always been worth much more than tuition, room, board and books. Hypothetically, let's say that the rule changes and collegiate players can receive moeny to play.
Some players, if they come from a low-income household, get a few hundred dollars each semester from Pell Grants which enables them to buy chicken soup instead of chicken-flavored ramen. If salaries were given, then these college student-athletes would have to pay taxes.
However, once the season started up, he couldn't work that job anymore. With every game being broadcast one way or another, these athletes are getting free exposure to help them possibly get drafted and play in the NFL or NBA, where they will and should get paid.
They are amateurs playing a game. And even if, increasingly, it wasn't enough and virtually every kid who accepted a scholarship was in the red before Christmas of his freshman year, the notion of pay-for-play was at best a logistical nightmare.
Those who say college student-athletes should not be paid argue that they receive scholarships as a form of payment for their talents. What about the top level talent? If a school makes a huge scientific achievement, they will be in the newspaper for a few days.
The best football and basketball players in the Big Ten have produced to the degree that a television network has become the model for every conference in America, a network worth at least tens of millions of dollars to the member institutions.
Cash or a salary could be spent on wants rather than necessities, potentially leading the athletes into a debt they would not have with the benefit of a scholarship.
The next year, they may transfer to another school with an even higher offer. Why or why not? Leave a comment and debate your position! Athletes earn their schools hundreds of thousands of dollars, increase enrollment, and if they do well, provide a recruiting piece for generations.
They will lose that hunger and passion that we see in college. They can wait a couple of years until they become professionals to make hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.
Collegiate sports and players are very popular. On top of having all of the responsibilities as every other student enrolled at the school, the athlete also has practice or a game every day during the season. That, in turn, can deprive other students of their chance to gain the education and experience at the college of their dreams, since their desired program will no longer be offered, says Anderson.
Will each player receive the same amount? Coaches might have a big effect on a team, but it is up to the athletes to get it done. Without these players playing the game there would not be demand for the networks to purchase the rights to broadcast the games.The NCAA men’s college basketball tournament is over: The University of Connecticut beat Kentucky,for the championship.
The debate whether college basketball and football players should be paid, however, is just beginning. Some people think that if the players can bargain over their working conditions, they will want to be paid, just as professional athletes are.
And this may change college sports forever. People who think college student-athletes should be paid often say the students’ names and images are used on products and in advertising, among other things, so they should receive some of the profits. Watch video · Paying college athletes a salary has become a popular idea.
But most are better off with tax-free scholarships, the way it works now. It may sound like. An Economist Explains Why College Athletes Should Be Paid Andy Schwarz explains why the NCAA is not only morally indefensible but economically ludicrous.
By Dave Zirin Twitter. The question, “Should college athletes be paid?” is re-hashed regularly. There are many advocates in favor of and many against the idea of paying athletes who play sports for their college or university.Download